Walter Booker, Jr. v. M. E. Engelke


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999811836-2]. Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00084-JLK-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999945401]. Mailed to: Walter D. Booker. [16-6428]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6428 Doc: 12 Filed: 10/12/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6428 WALTER DELANEY BOOKER, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. M. E. ENGELKE, Director of Food Services; N. GREGG, State Dietitian; H. PONTON, Regional Administrator, Western; L. FLEMING, Warden; M. BROYLES, FOMB; Q. REYNOLDS, Unit Manager; J. COMBS, Assistant Warden; BRYANT, Sergeant; CHOW HALL OFFICERS, C and D side; WITT, Correctional Officer; M. ELAM, Regional Administrator, Western, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:16-cv-00084-JLK-RSB) Submitted: September 22, 2016 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. KEENAN, Circuit Decided: Judges, and October 12, 2016 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter Delaney Booker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6428 Doc: 12 Filed: 10/12/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Walter Delaney Booker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we deny the motion for injunctive relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Booker v. Engelke, No. 7:16-cv-00084-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?