US v. Christopher Goad, Sr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:08-cr-00184-REP-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999919724]. Mailed to: Christopher Goad. [16-6436]
Appeal: 16-6436
Doc: 8
Filed: 08/30/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6436
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER FRED GOAD, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:08-cr-00184-REP-1)
Submitted:
August 25, 2016
Decided:
August 30, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Fred Goad, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Michael Ronald
Gill, Assistant United States Attorney, Erik Sean Siebert,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6436
Doc: 8
Filed: 08/30/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Fred Goad, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012).
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.
Goad,
No.
dispense
3:08-cr-00184-REP-1
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
(E.D.
Va.
because
presented
in
Mar.
the
the
United States v.
22,
facts
2016).
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?