US v. Christopher Goad, Sr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:08-cr-00184-REP-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999919724]. Mailed to: Christopher Goad. [16-6436]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6436 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/30/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6436 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER FRED GOAD, SR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cr-00184-REP-1) Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 30, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Fred Goad, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorney, Erik Sean Siebert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6436 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/30/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Fred Goad, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goad, No. dispense 3:08-cr-00184-REP-1 with contentions are oral argument adequately (E.D. Va. because presented in Mar. the the United States v. 22, facts 2016). We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?