Brandon Green v. Lindy Pendergra
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00147-CCE-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: appellant. [16-6441]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
BRANDON HAMILTON GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
LINDY PENDERGRASS; JOHN SELLEW; SGT. TOMMY CRAWFORD; OFFICER
Defendants - Appellees,
JOHN FOSTER, Jailor,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00147-CCE-LPA)
July 28, 2016
Before MOTZ and
August 2, 2016
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon Hamilton Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Sonny Sade Haynes,
WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Brandon Hamilton Green appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendants on Green’s 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) action.
On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Green’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Green has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order.
See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,
370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).
the district court’s judgment.
Accordingly, we affirm
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?