James Primus v. David Pascoe
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00125-DCN. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999873647]. Mailed to: James Primus. [16-6447]
Appeal: 16-6447
Doc: 11
Filed: 06/29/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6447
JAMES ANTHONY PRIMUS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID MICHAEL PASCOE; L. C. KNIGHT; MARGARET M. MCDONALD;
BRIAN BILLS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:16-cv-00125-DCN)
Submitted:
June 23, 2016
Decided:
June 29, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Anthony Primus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6447
Doc: 11
Filed: 06/29/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James
accepting
Anthony
the
Primus
appeals
recommendation
of
the
the
district
court’s
magistrate
order
judge
and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b) (2012) without prejudice.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We have
Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Pascoe, No. 2:16-cv-00125-DCN (D.S.C. Mar. 21, 2016).
Primus v.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?