James Primus v. David Pascoe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00125-DCN. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999873647]. Mailed to: James Primus. [16-6447]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6447 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6447 JAMES ANTHONY PRIMUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID MICHAEL PASCOE; L. C. KNIGHT; MARGARET M. MCDONALD; BRIAN BILLS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00125-DCN) Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Anthony Primus, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6447 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: James accepting Anthony the Primus appeals recommendation of the the district court’s magistrate order judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b) (2012) without prejudice. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pascoe, No. 2:16-cv-00125-DCN (D.S.C. Mar. 21, 2016). Primus v. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?