US v. Robert Winfield, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:95-cr-00193-REP-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999873577]. Mailed to: Robert Winfield, Jr.. [16-6463]

Appeal: 16-6463

Doc: 5

Filed: 06/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6463

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERT LEE WINFIELD, JR., a/k/a Tubbs,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, Senior District
Judge. (2:95-cr-00193-REP-1)

Submitted:

June 23, 2016

Decided:

June 29, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Winfield, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Kosky, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia; Stephen David
Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia;
Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport
News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6463

Doc: 5

Filed: 06/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Winfield, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

United States v. Winfield, No. 2:95-cr-00193-REP-

1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 2016).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2