William Judy v. Eric Wilson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999810397-2] Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00064-AWA-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999902318]. Mailed to: William Lee Judy. [16-6464]
Appeal: 16-6464
Doc: 8
Filed: 08/02/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6464
WILLIAM LEE JUDY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
ERIC WILSON,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:16-cv-00064-AWA-LRL)
Submitted:
July 28, 2016
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
August 2, 2016
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Judy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6464
Doc: 8
Filed: 08/02/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William Lee Judy, a federal prisoner,
court’s
order
petition.
error.
court.
on
his
28
U.S.C.
§ 2241
(2012)
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
we
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
district
Judy v. Wilson, No. 2:16-cv-00064-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Feb.
26, 2016).
before
relief
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis,
legal
denying
appeals the district
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?