William Judy v. Eric Wilson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999810397-2] Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00064-AWA-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999902318]. Mailed to: William Lee Judy. [16-6464]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6464 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6464 WILLIAM LEE JUDY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. ERIC WILSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00064-AWA-LRL) Submitted: July 28, 2016 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and August 2, 2016 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Lee Judy, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6464 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William Lee Judy, a federal prisoner, court’s order petition. error. court. on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) We have reviewed the record and find no reversible we affirm for the reasons stated by the district Judy v. Wilson, No. 2:16-cv-00064-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2016). before relief Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, legal denying appeals the district We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?