US v. Lemoyne Veney

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cr-00691-RDB-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999873228]. Mailed to: Lemoyne Veney. [16-6468]

Appeal: 16-6468

Doc: 11

Filed: 06/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6468

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LEMOYNE VENEY, a/k/a Victor Demaris,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:11-cr-00691-RDB-1)

Submitted:

June 23, 2016

Decided:

June 29, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lemoyne Veney, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United
States Attorney, Tamera Lynn Fine, Assistant United States
Attorney, Paul Nitze, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6468

Doc: 11

Filed: 06/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lemoyne Veney seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying several motions Veney filed in his pending 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2012) proceeding.

This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
neither

a

final

order

nor

The order Veney seeks to appeal is
an

appealable

interlocutory

or

collateral order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2