US v. Cleve Johnson

Filing

OPINION/ORDER DIRECTING LIMITED REMAND [4CCA retains jurisdiction]. Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00233-TDS-1,1:12-cv-00571-TDS-JLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Cleve Johnson. [999963261] [16-6469]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6469 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/07/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6469 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. CLEVE ALEXANDER JOHNSON, a/k/a Cuz, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00233-TDS-1; 1:12-cv-00571-TDS-JLW) Submitted: October 20, 2016 Decided: November 7, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harvey Alexander Carpenter, IV, LAW OFFICES OF H.A. CARPENTER IV, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Joan Brodish Childs, Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Randall Stuart Galyon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6469 Doc: 14 Filed: 11/07/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Cleve court’s Alexander order Johnson adopting the seeks report to and appeal the district recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Johnson’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The notice of appeal was received in the district court after expiration of the appeal period. However, Johnson claims that he did not receive notice of the district court’s final order in a timely manner. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to determine whether reopened the time under for Fed. filing R. App. a P. notice of 4(a)(6). appeal The should be record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. REMANDED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?