US v. Cleve Johnson
Filing
OPINION/ORDER DIRECTING LIMITED REMAND [4CCA retains jurisdiction]. Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00233-TDS-1,1:12-cv-00571-TDS-JLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Cleve Johnson. [999963261] [16-6469]
Appeal: 16-6469
Doc: 14
Filed: 11/07/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6469
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CLEVE ALEXANDER JOHNSON, a/k/a Cuz,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:08-cr-00233-TDS-1; 1:12-cv-00571-TDS-JLW)
Submitted:
October 20, 2016
Decided:
November 7, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harvey Alexander Carpenter, IV, LAW OFFICES OF H.A. CARPENTER
IV, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Joan Brodish
Childs, Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela
Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Randall
Stuart Galyon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6469
Doc: 14
Filed: 11/07/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Cleve
court’s
Alexander
order
Johnson
adopting
the
seeks
report
to
and
appeal
the
district
recommendation
of
the
magistrate judge and denying Johnson’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012)
motion.
The notice of appeal was received in the district court
after expiration of the appeal period.
However, Johnson claims
that he did not receive notice of the district court’s final
order in a timely manner.
Accordingly, we remand the case for
the limited purpose of allowing the district court to determine
whether
reopened
the
time
under
for
Fed.
filing
R.
App.
a
P.
notice
of
4(a)(6).
appeal
The
should
be
record,
as
supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further
consideration.
REMANDED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?