US v. Erscell World
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cr-00141-AWA-LRL-1 Copies to all parties and the district court. [999902215]. Mailed to: Erscell Julius Worlds. [16-6482]
Appeal: 16-6482
Doc: 8
Filed: 08/02/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6482
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERSCELL JULIUS WORLDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:14-cr-00141-AWA-LRL-1)
Submitted:
July 28, 2016
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
August 2, 2016
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Erscell Julius Worlds, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Norfolk,
Virginia,
for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6482
Doc: 8
Filed: 08/02/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Erscell Julius Worlds appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion for a sentence reduction. ∗
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
United
States
(E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 2016).
v.
Worlds,
No.
2:14-cr-00141-AWA-LRL-1
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗
Worlds’ notice of appeal was not timely filed. We decline
to dismiss the appeal, however, because the Government has not
moved to dismiss the appeal, and the appeal period in criminal
cases is not jurisdictional. United States v. Urutyan, 564 F.3d
679, 684-86 (4th Cir. 2009).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?