US v. Erscell World

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cr-00141-AWA-LRL-1 Copies to all parties and the district court. [999902215]. Mailed to: Erscell Julius Worlds. [16-6482]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6482 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6482 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ERSCELL JULIUS WORLDS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:14-cr-00141-AWA-LRL-1) Submitted: July 28, 2016 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and August 2, 2016 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Erscell Julius Worlds, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6482 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Erscell Julius Worlds appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion for a sentence reduction. ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 2016). v. Worlds, No. 2:14-cr-00141-AWA-LRL-1 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED ∗ Worlds’ notice of appeal was not timely filed. We decline to dismiss the appeal, however, because the Government has not moved to dismiss the appeal, and the appeal period in criminal cases is not jurisdictional. United States v. Urutyan, 564 F.3d 679, 684-86 (4th Cir. 2009). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?