US v. Byron Anthony Grey, Jr.
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:08-cr-00462-RWT-1,8:13-cv-01599-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Byron Grey, Jr.. [16-6523]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
BYRON ANTHONY GREY, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
August 25, 2016
August 30, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Byron Anthony Grey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Stacy Dawson Belf,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 3
§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012).
A certificate of appealability will not
The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012).
district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies
find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional
claims is debatable or wrong.
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,
When the district court denies relief on procedural
grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive
procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a
debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
529 U.S. at 484-85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Grey has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we deny a
Pg: 3 of 3
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?