Charles Galloway v. USA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999804886-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00578-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999873436]. Mailed to: Galloway. [16-6541]

Appeal: 16-6541

Doc: 12

Filed: 06/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6541

CHARLES LEONARD GALLOWAY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
USA,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:16-cv-00578-ELH)

Submitted:

June 23, 2016

Decided:

June 29, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Leonard Galloway, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6541

Doc: 12

Filed: 06/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Charles
court’s

Leonard

order

Galloway

transferring

seeks

his

to

appeal

complaint

the

filed

district

pursuant

to

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403

U.S.

388

(1971),

to

another

district.

This

court

may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2012),

and

certain

interlocutory

and

collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus.

Loan

Galloway

Corp.,

seeks

to

337

U.S.

appeal

is

541,

545-46

neither

a

(1949).
final

appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

The

order

order

nor

an

See TechnoSteel,

LLC v. Beers Constr. Co., 271 F.3d 151, 154 & n.2 (4th Cir.
2001).

Accordingly, we deny Galloway’s motion to assign counsel

and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2