US v. Rodeques Wilson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999797499-2]. Originating case number: 4:15-cr-00095-BHH-9. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999925114]. Mailed to: Rodeques Wilson. [16-6556]
Appeal: 16-6556
Doc: 9
Filed: 09/08/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6556
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RODEQUES LAMONT WILSON, a/k/a Mont, a/k/a Flip,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge.
(4:15-cr-00095-BHH-9)
Submitted:
August 18, 2016
Decided:
September 8, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodeques Lamont Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6556
Doc: 9
Filed: 09/08/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Rodeques Lamont Wilson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel his attorney to turn over to him the
case file in his criminal case.
find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court.
United States v. Wilson, No. 4:15-cr-00095-
BHH-9 (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?