Darnell M. Cleaton v. Harold Clarke

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999851715-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00443-LO-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999902330]. Mailed to: Darnell M. Cleaton GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER 901 Corrections Way Route 1, Box 205 Jarratt, VA 23870-9614. [16-6575]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6575 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6575 DARNELL M. CLEATON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director; B.W. BOOKER, Warden of Green Rock, Respondents – Appellees, and UNKNOWN, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at ALexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00443-LO-IDD) Submitted: July 28, 2016 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and August 2, 2016 DAVIS, Senior Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darnell M. Cleaton, Appellant Pro Se. Senior Assistant Attorney General, Appellees. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, Richmond, Virginia, for Appeal: 16-6575 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-6575 Doc: 14 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Darnell M. Cleaton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying six motions in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). The order Cleaton seeks to appeal is neither a final order an nor Accordingly, we appealable deny interlocutory leave to proceed or in collateral forma dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before order. pauperis and We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?