Daniel King v. Charles Ratledge
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999813813-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02183-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999936345]. Mailed to: Daniel H. King. [16-6582]
Appeal: 16-6582
Doc: 8
Filed: 09/27/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6582
DANIEL H. KING,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
CHARLES RATLEDGE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:15-hc-02183-FL)
Submitted:
September 20, 2016
Before AGEE and
Circuit Judge.
WYNN,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
and
September 27, 2016
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel H. King, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6582
Doc: 8
Filed: 09/27/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Daniel
civilly
H.
King,
committed
a
under
District
the
Adam
of
Columbia
Walsh
Child
Code
offender
Protection
and
Safety Act, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28
U.S.C.
§ 2241
(2012)
petition
without
prejudice.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
King v. Ratledge,
No. 5:15-hc-02183-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2016).
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?