Daniel King v. Charles Ratledge

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999813813-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02183-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999936345]. Mailed to: Daniel H. King. [16-6582]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6582 Doc: 8 Filed: 09/27/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6582 DANIEL H. KING, Petitioner – Appellant, v. CHARLES RATLEDGE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:15-hc-02183-FL) Submitted: September 20, 2016 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. WYNN, Circuit Decided: Judges, and September 27, 2016 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel H. King, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6582 Doc: 8 Filed: 09/27/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Daniel civilly H. King, committed a under District the Adam of Columbia Walsh Child Code offender Protection and Safety Act, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Ratledge, No. 5:15-hc-02183-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?