Chris Murray v. Loretta Lynch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-03865-TDC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999919736]. Mailed to: Chris Murray. [16-6585]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6585 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/30/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6585 CHRIS MURRAY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General; IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT - (ICE); UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:14-cv-03865-TDC) Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 30, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chris Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Andersen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6585 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/30/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Chris Murray appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s mandamus relief. reversible error. motion We to have dismiss in reviewed the his action record and seeking find no Accordingly, we affirm the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Murray v. Lynch, No. 8:14-cv-03865-TDC (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?