Chris Murray v. Loretta Lynch
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-03865-TDC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999919736]. Mailed to: Chris Murray. [16-6585]
Appeal: 16-6585
Doc: 7
Filed: 08/30/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6585
CHRIS MURRAY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General; IMMIGRATION AND
CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT - (ICE); UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge.
(8:14-cv-03865-TDC)
Submitted:
August 25, 2016
Decided:
August 30, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chris Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Andersen, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6585
Doc: 7
Filed: 08/30/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Chris Murray appeals the district court’s order granting
the
Government’s
mandamus
relief.
reversible error.
motion
We
to
have
dismiss
in
reviewed
the
his
action
record
and
seeking
find
no
Accordingly, we affirm the appeal for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Murray v. Lynch, No.
8:14-cv-03865-TDC (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2016).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?