Anthony Kelly v. Leslie Simpson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for default judgment [999917928-2]; denying Motion for hearing [999919087-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-03647-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999971945]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-6598]
Appeal: 16-6598
Doc: 28
Filed: 11/21/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6598
ANTHONY QUINTIN KELLY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LESLIE SIMPSON, Case Management Specialist; LIEUTENANT
GEORGE B. MCALPINE; SERGEANT ROBERT WERNER; DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-03647-RDB)
Submitted:
November 17, 2016
Before GREGORY,
Judges.
Chief
Judge,
Decided:
and
MOTZ
and
November 21, 2016
TRAXLER,
Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith
Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6598
Doc: 28
Filed: 11/21/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Kelly v. Simpson, No. 1:15-cv-03647-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 12,
2016).
We deny Kelly’s motions for default judgment and for a
hearing.
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?