Anthony Kelly v. Leslie Simpson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for default judgment [999917928-2]; denying Motion for hearing [999919087-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-03647-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999971945]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-6598]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6598 Doc: 28 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6598 ANTHONY QUINTIN KELLY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LESLIE SIMPSON, Case Management Specialist; LIEUTENANT GEORGE B. MCALPINE; SERGEANT ROBERT WERNER; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:15-cv-03647-RDB) Submitted: November 17, 2016 Before GREGORY, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: and MOTZ and November 21, 2016 TRAXLER, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6598 Doc: 28 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelly v. Simpson, No. 1:15-cv-03647-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 12, 2016). We deny Kelly’s motions for default judgment and for a hearing. legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?