Tyrell Reese, Sr. v. Bob McCabe
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999817239-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999814938-2] Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00441-MSD-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999929982]. Mailed to: Tyrell A. Reese, Sr.. [16-6602]
Appeal: 16-6602
Doc: 13
Filed: 09/15/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6602
TYRELL A. REESE, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOB MCCABE, Sheriff of Norfolk City Jail; DEPUTY OWENS,
Transportation (Driver); DEPUTY MITCHELL, Transportation
(Other),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge.
(2:15-cv-00441-MSD-LRL)
Submitted:
September 13, 2016
Decided:
September 15, 2016
Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrell A. Reese, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Jonathan Lewis Stone,
NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6602
Doc: 13
Filed: 09/15/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrell A. Reese, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
deny
Reese’s
motions
for
appointment
of
We have
Accordingly, we
counsel
and
for
a
transcript at government expense and affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Reese v. McCabe, No. 2:15-cv-00441-MSD-
LRL (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?