Tyrell Reese, Sr. v. Bob McCabe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999817239-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999814938-2] Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00441-MSD-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999929982]. Mailed to: Tyrell A. Reese, Sr.. [16-6602]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6602 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/15/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6602 TYRELL A. REESE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOB MCCABE, Sheriff of Norfolk City Jail; DEPUTY OWENS, Transportation (Driver); DEPUTY MITCHELL, Transportation (Other), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:15-cv-00441-MSD-LRL) Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 15, 2016 Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrell A. Reese, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Lewis Stone, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6602 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/15/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Tyrell A. Reese, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. deny Reese’s motions for appointment of We have Accordingly, we counsel and for a transcript at government expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reese v. McCabe, No. 2:15-cv-00441-MSD- LRL (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?