Clarence Miller v. Kimberly Garvin
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999863461-2]. Originating case number: 6:15-cv-00108-TMC. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Clarence Miller. [16-6604]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
SGT KIMBERLY GARVIN, a/k/a Kimberly Garvin; DHO MR. ERNEST
Defendants - Appellees,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:15-cv-00108-TMC)
Submitted: June 20, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Decided: June 22, 2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Clarence Scott Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Carmen Vaughn Ganjehsani, RICHARDSON
PLOWDEN, Columbia, South Carolina, and Drew Hamilton Butler, RICHARDSON
PLOWDEN, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Clarence Scott Miller appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Miller’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
motion for failure to comply with a discovery order and for lack of prosecution under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 & 41. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Garvin, No.
6:15-cv-00108-TMC (D.S.C. Mar. 8, 2016). We deny Miller’s motion for appointment
of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?