Alan Royall v. Justin Andrew

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999871609-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02154-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999949417]. Mailed to: Alan Royall FCI PETERSBURG MEDIUM FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 1000 Petersburg, VA 23804. [16-6607]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6607 Doc: 12 Filed: 10/18/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6607 ALAN ROYALL, Petitioner – Appellant, v. JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-hc-02154-D) Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alan Royall, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6607 Doc: 12 Filed: 10/18/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Alan Royall, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the reasons stated by the district court. Royall v. Andrews, No. 5:15-hc-02154-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2016). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * To the extent Royall argues that the Supreme Court’s opinion in Persaud v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1023 (2014) invalidates our opinion in In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir. 2000), until the Supreme Court or an en banc panel of this court issues a substantive opinion overruling Jones, that decision remains binding in this circuit. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?