Michael James v. Leroy Cartledge
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999872684-2] Originating case number: 9:15-cv-00625-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999950444]. Mailed to: Michael James. [16-6609]
Appeal: 16-6609
Doc: 16
Filed: 10/19/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6609
MICHAEL D. JAMES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden; SCOTT LEWIS, Assistant Warden of
Security; NFN MURSIER, Major of Security; OFFICER GOBLE,
#051041,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (9:15-cv-00625-TLW)
Submitted:
October 11, 2016
Decided:
October 19, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. James, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,
MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & ROPER, LLC, Greenwood,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6609
Doc: 16
Filed: 10/19/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
James
the
PER CURIAM:
Michael
D.
appeals
district
court’s
order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting
summary
judgment
to
defendants
§ 1983 (2012) complaint.
no reversible error.
stated
by
the
and
dismissing
appointment
U.S.C.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
district
of
42
We have reviewed the record and find
court.
James
9:15-cv-00625-TLW (D.S.C. Apr. 12, 2016).
for
his
counsel
and
dispense
v.
Cartledge,
No.
We deny James’ motion
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?