US v. Isaac Sturdivant

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cr-00123-WO-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999915450]. Mailed to: Isaac Norel Sturdivant. [16-6629]

Appeal: 16-6629

Doc: 7

Filed: 08/23/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6629

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ISAAC NOREL STURDIVANT,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
William L. Osteen,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00123-WO-1)

Submitted:

August 18, 2016

Decided:

August 23, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaac Norel Sturdivant, Appellant Pro Se. Michael A. DeFranco,
Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett
Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North
Carolina, Paul Alexander Weinman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6629

Doc: 7

Filed: 08/23/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Isaac Norel Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order
granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction

based

on

Guidelines Manual. *
reversible error.

Amendment

782

of

the

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
See United States v. Sturdivant, No.

1:10–cr–00123-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2016).
argument

adequately

Sentencing

We have reviewed the record and find no

by the district court.

oral

U.S.

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

*

The district court granted Sturdivant’s § 3582(c)(2)
motion, but did not reduce his sentence to the full extent he
requested.

2