US v. Isaac Sturdivant


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cr-00123-WO-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999915450]. Mailed to: Isaac Norel Sturdivant. [16-6629]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6629 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/23/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6629 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ISAAC NOREL STURDIVANT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00123-WO-1) Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 23, 2016 Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Isaac Norel Sturdivant, Appellant Pro Se. Michael A. DeFranco, Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, Paul Alexander Weinman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6629 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/23/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Isaac Norel Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Guidelines Manual. * reversible error. Amendment 782 of the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated See United States v. Sturdivant, No. 1:10–cr–00123-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2016). argument adequately Sentencing We have reviewed the record and find no by the district court. oral U.S. because presented in the the facts and materials legal before We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The district court granted Sturdivant’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, but did not reduce his sentence to the full extent he requested. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?