US v. Isaac Sturdivant
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cr-00123-WO-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Isaac Norel Sturdivant. [16-6629]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
ISAAC NOREL STURDIVANT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
William L. Osteen,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00123-WO-1)
August 18, 2016
August 23, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Isaac Norel Sturdivant, Appellant Pro Se. Michael A. DeFranco,
Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett
Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North
Carolina, Paul Alexander Weinman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Isaac Norel Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order
granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
Guidelines Manual. *
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
See United States v. Sturdivant, No.
1:10–cr–00123-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2016).
We have reviewed the record and find no
by the district court.
We dispense with
argument would not aid the decisional process.
The district court granted Sturdivant’s § 3582(c)(2)
motion, but did not reduce his sentence to the full extent he
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?