Eddie Milton Garey, Jr. v. Andrew Mansukeani

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to extend filing time [999864009-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999832036-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-00056-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999894508]. Mailed to: Eddie Garey, Jr.. [16-6634]

Appeal: 16-6634

Doc: 13

Filed: 07/22/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6634

EDDIE MILTON GAREY, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
ANDREW MANSUKEANI, Warden of Estill FCI,
Respondent - Appellee,
and
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., US Attorney General,
Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Bruce H. Hendricks, District
Judge. (8:15-cv-00056-BHH)

Submitted:

July 21, 2016

Decided:

July 22, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Milton Garey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6634

Doc: 13

Filed: 07/22/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Eddie Milton Garey, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the
district

court’s

order

accepting

the

recommendation

of

the

magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice ∗ his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition and the court’s order denying his Fed. R.
Civ. P. 59(e) motion.
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Garey v. Mansukeani, No. 8:15-cv-00056-

BHH (D.S.C. Jan. 7, 2016; Apr. 19, 2016).

We grant Garey’s

motion

his

for

an

extension

of

time

to

file

supplemental

informal brief, and we deny Garey’s motion for appointment of
counsel.
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

∗

We conclude that the district court’s dismissal order is a
final, appealable order.
See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid
Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24, 629-30 (4th Cir. 2015).

2