US v. Samuel Holme

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:05-cr-01253-MBS-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999970716]. Mailed to: Samuel Rodney Holmes. [16-6635]

Appeal: 16-6635

Doc: 6

Filed: 11/18/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6635

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL RODNEY HOLMES,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District
Judge. (1:05-cr-01253-MBS-1)

Submitted:

November 8, 2016

Decided:

November 18, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Rodney Holmes, Appellant Pro Se.
Susan Zalkin Hitt,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6635

Doc: 6

Filed: 11/18/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Samuel
denying

his

Rodney
motion

Holmes
for

appeals

the

reconsideration

district
of

its

court’s

order

earlier

order

granting him a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2012).

In the prior order, the district court reduced his

sentence to the bottom of his amended Guidelines range.

In his

motion for reconsideration, Holmes sought a further reduction.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

See United States v. Holmes, No. 1:05-cr-01253-MBS-1

(D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2016; Nov. 24, 2015).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2