US v. Samuel Holme


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:05-cr-01253-MBS-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999970716]. Mailed to: Samuel Rodney Holmes. [16-6635]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6635 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/18/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6635 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SAMUEL RODNEY HOLMES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cr-01253-MBS-1) Submitted: November 8, 2016 Decided: November 18, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Rodney Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Zalkin Hitt, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6635 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/18/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Samuel denying his Rodney motion Holmes for appeals the reconsideration district of its court’s order earlier order granting him a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). In the prior order, the district court reduced his sentence to the bottom of his amended Guidelines range. In his motion for reconsideration, Holmes sought a further reduction. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Holmes, No. 1:05-cr-01253-MBS-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2016; Nov. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?