Sam Frederick v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:15-cv-02699-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999929955]. Mailed to: S Frederick. [16-6638]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6638 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/15/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6638 SAM FREDERICK, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (9:15-cv-02699-MGL) Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 15, 2016 Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sam Frederick, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6638 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/15/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Sam Frederick appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant the United States summary judgment on Frederick’s malpractice action, brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671–2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 2016). and find district no reversible court’s error. judgment. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, Frederick 9:15-cv-02699-MGL (D.S.C. Apr. 4, 2016). v. we United affirm the States, No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?