Sam Frederick v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:15-cv-02699-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999929955]. Mailed to: S Frederick. [16-6638]
Appeal: 16-6638
Doc: 13
Filed: 09/15/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6638
SAM FREDERICK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(9:15-cv-02699-MGL)
Submitted:
September 13, 2016
Decided:
September 15, 2016
Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sam Frederick, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6638
Doc: 13
Filed: 09/15/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Sam Frederick appeals the district court’s order accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant the United States
summary
judgment
on
Frederick’s
malpractice
action,
brought
pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346,
2671–2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 2016).
and
find
district
no
reversible
court’s
error.
judgment.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly,
Frederick
9:15-cv-02699-MGL (D.S.C. Apr. 4, 2016).
v.
we
United
affirm
the
States,
No.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?