US v. Latwon Jame

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:13-cr-00012-D-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999915339]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-6656]

Appeal: 16-6656

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/23/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6656

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LATWON JAMES, a/k/a Birdie Bird,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (7:13-cr-00012-D-1)

Submitted:

August 18, 2016

Decided:

August 23, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Clayton Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Leslie Katherine Cooley,
Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Timothy
Severo, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6656

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/23/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Latwon James appeals the district court’s order denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion seeking a sentence reduction
under Amendment 782.

After reviewing the record, we conclude that

the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.

See

United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304-05 (4th Cir. 2013)
(reviewing

disposition

discretion).
judgment.

of

Accordingly,

§ 3582(c)(2)
we

affirm

motion
the

for

district

abuse

of

court’s

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2