US v. Wainsworth Hall

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000052042]. [16-6658]

Appeal: 16-6658

Doc: 46

Filed: 03/30/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6658

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
WAINSWORTH MARCELLUS HALL, a/k/a Unique,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-1)

Submitted: March 27, 2017

Decided: March 30, 2017

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nicholas David Renninger, KOZAK, DAVIS, RENNINGER & BELOTE, P.C.,
Portsmouth, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Randy C.
Stoker, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6658

Doc: 46

Filed: 03/30/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Wainsworth Marcellus Hall appeals the district court’s order denying his motions
to reconsider the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. The
district court lacked jurisdiction to grant Hall’s motions for reconsideration, see United
States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), and therefore we affirm the
district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2