US v. Wainsworth Hall
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency . [16-6658]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
WAINSWORTH MARCELLUS HALL, a/k/a Unique,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-1)
Submitted: March 27, 2017
Decided: March 30, 2017
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicholas David Renninger, KOZAK, DAVIS, RENNINGER & BELOTE, P.C.,
Portsmouth, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Randy C.
Stoker, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Wainsworth Marcellus Hall appeals the district court’s order denying his motions
to reconsider the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. The
district court lacked jurisdiction to grant Hall’s motions for reconsideration, see United
States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), and therefore we affirm the
district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?