US v. Wainsworth Hall


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000052042]. [16-6658]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6658 Doc: 46 Filed: 03/30/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6658 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. WAINSWORTH MARCELLUS HALL, a/k/a Unique, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-1) Submitted: March 27, 2017 Decided: March 30, 2017 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nicholas David Renninger, KOZAK, DAVIS, RENNINGER & BELOTE, P.C., Portsmouth, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Randy C. Stoker, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6658 Doc: 46 Filed: 03/30/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Wainsworth Marcellus Hall appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to reconsider the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. The district court lacked jurisdiction to grant Hall’s motions for reconsideration, see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), and therefore we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?