Thomas Leath v. US
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00248-CCE-LPA. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Thomas Delawrence Leath. [16-6672]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS DELAWRENCE LEATH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION;
AGENTS KNOWN AND UNKNOWN; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00248-CCE-LPA)
December 15, 2016
December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Delawrence Leath, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Thomas Delawrence Leath appeals the district court’s order
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing for
failure to state a claim, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii),
Leath’s Bivens * complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Leath v. United States, No. 1:16-cv-00248-
CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. May 9, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?