Corey Sanders v. C. Ratledge

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999837833-2] Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00151-GEC-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999940835]. Mailed to: C Sanders. [16-6675]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6675 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/04/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6675 COREY L. SANDERS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. C. RATLEDGE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:16-cv-00151-GEC-RSB) Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 4, 2016 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corey L. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6675 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/04/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Corey L. Sanders, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order petition. error. forma denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, pauperis and we we grant affirm Sanders’ for the motion reasons to proceed stated by in the district court. Sanders v. Ratledge, No. 7:16-cv-00151-GEC-RSB (W.D. 21, Va. Apr. 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?