Corey Sanders v. C. Ratledge
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999837833-2] Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00151-GEC-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999940835]. Mailed to: C Sanders. [16-6675]
Appeal: 16-6675
Doc: 9
Filed: 10/04/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6675
COREY L. SANDERS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
C. RATLEDGE, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:16-cv-00151-GEC-RSB)
Submitted:
September 29, 2016
Decided:
October 4, 2016
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Corey L. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6675
Doc: 9
Filed: 10/04/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Corey L. Sanders, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s
order
petition.
error.
forma
denying
relief
on
his
28
U.S.C.
§ 2241
(2012)
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly,
pauperis
and
we
we
grant
affirm
Sanders’
for
the
motion
reasons
to
proceed
stated
by
in
the
district court.
Sanders v. Ratledge, No. 7:16-cv-00151-GEC-RSB
(W.D.
21,
Va.
Apr.
2016).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?