Demetrius Smalls v. Alan Wilson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999924524-2], denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999906814-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999905242-2], denying Motion for other relief [999898409-2] Originating case number: 2:15-cv-04014-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999972121]. Mailed to: Demetrius Smalls. [16-6683]

Appeal: 16-6683

Doc: 22

Filed: 11/21/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6683

DEMETRIUS JAROD SMALLS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ALAN WILSON; SCARLETT WILSON; TRIPP LAWTON; LINDA LOMBARD;
J. AL CANON, JR.; D. PETERS; W. DIXON; RICHARD M. GERGEL;
DAVID HOLTON; DAVID WHITTEN WOLF,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (2:15-cv-04014-MBS)

Submitted:

October 28, 2016

Decided:

November 21, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetrius Jarod Smalls, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6683

Doc: 22

Filed: 11/21/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Demetrius Jarod Smalls appeals the district court’s order
accepting

the

recommendation

dismissing

Smalls’

action

of

for

the

failure

magistrate
to

state

judge
a

claim

assessing a strike under 18 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we

affirm

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

and
and

We have

Accordingly,

district

court.

Smalls v. Wilson, No. 2:15-cv-04014-MBS (D.S.C. May 11, 2016).
We deny Smalls’ motions for due process of law, for relief under
Fed. R. App. P. 27, and for release pending appeal.

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2