Ira Teague v. John Aslett

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03057-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999940955]. Mailed to: Ira Teague. [16-6688]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6688 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/04/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6688 IRA TEAGUE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN ASLETT, Defendant – Appellee, and H. SHAKER, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03057-D) Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 4, 2016 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ira Teague, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6688 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/04/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ira relief Teague on his appeals 42 the U.S.C. district § 1983 court’s (2012) order complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. denying We Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. v. Aslett, dispense No. with contentions are 5:14-ct-03057-D oral argument adequately (E.D.N.C. because presented in May the the 9, facts have Teague 2016). We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?