Warren Russell v. Warden Reynold

Filing

OPINION/ORDER DIRECTING LIMITED REMAND [4CCA retains jurisdiction]. Originating case number: 9:14-cv-04035-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Warren Russell. [999968978] [16-6694]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6694 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/16/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6694 WARREN RUSSELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN REYNOLDS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (9:14-cv-04035-JMC) Submitted: October 20, 2016 Decided: November 16, 2016 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Melody Jane Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6694 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/16/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Warren Russell seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate relief on Russell’s notice of appeal after expiration 28 was of judge’s U.S.C. received the recommendation § 2254 in appeal the (2012) denying petition. district period. and court Because The shortly Russell is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). The record does not reveal when Russell gave the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. REMANDED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?