Jeffrey Servidio v. Sergeant Pittman

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying motion to appoint counsel [999844188-2] Originating case number: 5:13-ct-03072-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999929873]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-6696]

Appeal: 16-6696

Doc: 16

Filed: 09/15/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6696

JEFFREY SERVIDIO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT PITTMAN; SERGEANT PRICE,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief
District Judge. (5:13-ct-03072-D)

Submitted:

September 13, 2016

Decided:

September 15, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Servidio, Appellant Pro Se.
Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6696

Doc: 16

Filed: 09/15/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Servidio seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion for appointment of counsel.

This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

The order Servidio seeks

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order.

Accordingly, we deny Servidio’s motion for

appointment of counsel on appeal and dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.
DISMISSED

2