Gary Andrew Boyd v. Dr. Tesemma
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00196-RAJ-DEM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000015742]. Mailed to: Gary Boyd. [16-6698]
Appeal: 16-6698
Doc: 15
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6698
GARY ANDREW BOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. NEGASH TESEMMA; DIRECTOR NURSE S. HICKS; ADMINISTRATOR
T. MOORE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:14-cv-00196-RAJ-DEM)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Decided:
February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Andrew Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney,
RAWLS,
MCNELIS
&
MITCHELL,
PC,
Richmond,
Virginia,
for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6698
Doc: 15
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Gary
Andrew
Boyd
appeals
the
district
court’s
granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
order
We have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Boyd v.
Tesemma, No. 2:14-cv-00196-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 26, 2016
&
entered
Apr.
27,
2016).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?