Gary Andrew Boyd v. Dr. Tesemma


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00196-RAJ-DEM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000015742]. Mailed to: Gary Boyd. [16-6698]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6698 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6698 GARY ANDREW BOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. NEGASH TESEMMA; DIRECTOR NURSE S. HICKS; ADMINISTRATOR T. MOORE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00196-RAJ-DEM) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Andrew Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6698 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Gary Andrew Boyd appeals the district court’s granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. order We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boyd v. Tesemma, No. 2:14-cv-00196-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 26, 2016 & entered Apr. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?