Thomas Littek v. Harold Clarke
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00072-JLK-PMS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Thomas Littek. [16-6703]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS ANTHONY LITTEK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VDOC; FREDERICK SCHILLING, VDOC’s
Medical Director; STANLEY YOUNG, Warden at PSCC; ADAM K.
Defendants – Appellees,
contracted to provide medical and dental services to VDOC,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:16-cv-00072-JLK-PMS)
September 20, 2016
October 12, 2016
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Anthony Littek, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Haeberle Cahill,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richard Carson
Pg: 2 of 3
Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Thomas Anthony Littek appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
his motion for a preliminary injunction.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.
Littek v. Clarke, No.
7:16-cv-00072-JLK-PMS (W.D. Va. May 9, 2016).
We dispense with
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?