US v. Eric Van Buren

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:00-cr-00066-NKM-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999940945]. Mailed to: Eric Martin Van Buren. [16-6714]

Appeal: 16-6714

Doc: 10

Filed: 10/04/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6714

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERIC MARTIN VAN BUREN,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville.
Norman K. Moon,
Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00066-NKM-1)

Submitted:

September 29, 2016

Decided:

October 4, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Martin Van Buren, Appellant Pro Se.
Jean Barrett Hudson,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6714

Doc: 10

Filed: 10/04/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Eric Martin Van Buren appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his “motion to have heard new substantive rule
per

the

court’s

discretion,”

and

his

motion

to

correct

presentence report pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.
also

appeals

the

his

Van Buren

district

court’s

subsequent

reconsideration.

We

reviewed

the

reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

have

order

record

and

denying
find

no

United States v. Van Buren, No. 3:00-cr-

00066-NKM-1 (W.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2016; May 20, 2016).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2