US v. Roberto Darden
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:11-cr-00052-AWA-LRL-1, 4:14-cv-00136-AWA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999929943]. Mailed to: Roberto Darden. [16-6725]
Appeal: 16-6725
Doc: 6
Filed: 09/15/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6725
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERTO ANTOINE DARDEN, a/k/a “Dizz-e”, a/k/a “Javon”,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (4:11-cr-00052-AWA-LRL-1; 4:14-cv-00136-AWA)
Submitted:
September 13, 2016
Decided:
September 15, 2016
Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roberto Antoine Darden, Appellant Pro Se.
Lisa Rae McKeel,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia;
Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6725
Doc: 6
Filed: 09/15/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Roberto Antoine Darden seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his request for discovery in connection with his 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.
R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.
541, 545-46 (1949).
The order Darden seeks to appeal is neither
a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?