US v. Okang Rochelle


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case numbers: 1:05-cr-00112-WO-1, 1:12-cv-01121-WO-JLW. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000045814]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-6743]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6743 Doc: 15 Filed: 03/21/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6743 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. OKANG KAREEN ROCHELLE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:05-cr-00112-WO-1; 1:12-cv-01121WO-JLW) Submitted: March 9, 2017 Decided: March 21, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Okang Kareen Rochelle, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Anand P. Ramaswamy, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6743 Doc: 15 Filed: 03/21/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 PER CURIAM: Okang Kareen Rochelle seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” (2012). 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this jurists would reasonable standard find by that demonstrating the district that court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). denies relief demonstrate on both procedural that the When the district court grounds, dispositive the prisoner procedural must ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rochelle has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. dispense with oral argument because 2 the facts and We legal Appeal: 16-6743 Doc: 15 contentions are Filed: 03/21/2017 adequately Pg: 3 of 3 presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?