William Allen Owens v. Warden
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999903052-2] Originating case number: 5:14-cv-03685-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999940870]. Mailed to: Owens. [16-6787]
Appeal: 16-6787
Doc: 8
Filed: 10/04/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6787
WILLIAM ALLEN OWENS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
Respondent - Appellee,
and
SOUTH CAROLINA, State of,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
R. Bryan Harwell, District
Judge. (5:14-cv-03685-RBH)
Submitted:
September 29, 2016
Decided:
October 4, 2016
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Allen Owens, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald John Zelenka,
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6787
Doc: 8
Filed: 10/04/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William Allen Owens seeks to appeal the district court’s
order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
and
dismissing
Owens’
28
U.S.C.
§ 2254
(2012)
petition.
We
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice
of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties
are
accorded
30
days
after
the
entry
of
the
district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed.
R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).
“[T]he timely
filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.”
Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on
June 23, 2015.
The notice of appeal was filed on June 7, 2016.
Because Owens failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to
obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal.
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?