US v. Wilson Hill

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:14-cr-00003-AWA-LRL-1, 4:15-cv-00015-AWA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999929914]. Mailed to: Wilson Hill. [16-6798]

Appeal: 16-6798

Doc: 7

Filed: 09/15/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6798

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILSON HILL,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (4:14-cr-00003-AWA-LRL-1; 4:15-cv-00015-AWA)

Submitted:

September 13, 2016

Decided:

September 15, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilson Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United
States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6798

Doc: 7

Filed: 09/15/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Wilson

Hill

seeks

to

appeal

the

district

court’s

order

granting in part and denying in part his motion filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012).

United States v. Hill, No. 4:14-cr-

00003-AWA-LRL-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 19, 2016 & entered May 23,
2016).

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
The order Hill seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

Accordingly, we
We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

2