US v. Reggie W. Canady

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:02-cr-00127-F-3 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999940994]. Mailed to: Reggie Waldo Canady FCI PETERSBURG LOW FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 1000 Petersburg, VA 23804-0000. [16-6828]

Appeal: 16-6828

Doc: 6

Filed: 10/04/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6828

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
REGGIE W. CANADY,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:02-cr-00127-F-3)

Submitted:

September 29, 2016

Decided:

October 4, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reggie W. Canady, Appellant Pro Se.
Edward D. Gray, Ethan A.
Ontjes, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6828

Doc: 6

Filed: 10/04/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Reggie

Waldo

Canady

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of

sentence

Guidelines.
error.

based

on

Amendment

782

to

the

U.S.

Sentencing

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

United States v. Canady, No. 7:02-cr-00127-F-3

(E.D.N.C. June 3, 2016).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2