US v. Charles Davis

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-cr-00032-RLV-DSC-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999940785]. Mailed to: Charles A. Davis. [16-6837]

Appeal: 16-6837

Doc: 5

Filed: 10/04/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6837

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHARLES A. DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (5:11-cr-00032-RLV-DSC-1)

Submitted:

September 29, 2016

Decided:

October 4, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles A. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant
United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Jenny Grus
Sugar, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6837

Doc: 5

Filed: 10/04/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying
his Rule 60(b) motion and various other motions.
the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v.

Davis, No. 5:11-cr-00032-RLV-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. June 13, 2016).

We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2