Walter Jenkins v. Leslie Fleming

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999897492-2]; denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999897487-2], denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999886239-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00018-CMH-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999952124].. [16-6851]

Appeal: 16-6851

Doc: 15

Filed: 10/21/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6851

WALTER DOUGLAS JENKINS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
LESLIE FLEMING,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00018-CMH-TCB)

Submitted:

October 18, 2016

Decided:

October 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Douglas Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6851

Doc: 15

Filed: 10/21/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Walter Douglas Jenkins appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reopen the time to file an appeal pursuant
to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).
find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed

in forma pauperis, deny Jenkins’ motion for a certificate of
appealability, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Jenkins v. Fleming, No. 1:16-cv-00018-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va.

filed June 6, 2016; entered June 7, 2016).
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2