US v. Manoj Jha


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to impose sanctions [999952594-2]; denying Motion to vacate [999914962-2] Originating case number: 1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999973224].. [16-6856]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6856 Doc: 19 Filed: 11/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6856 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MANOJ KUMAR JHA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1) Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Manoj Kumar Jha, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6856 Doc: 19 Filed: 11/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Manoj Kumar Jha appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial and denying his motion for reconsideration of the order granting the Government an extension of time to file a response. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jha, No. 1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1 (D. Md. June 13, 2016). We deny Jha’s motion for sanctions and his motion to vacate this court’s decision in United States v. Jha, 613 F. App’x 212 (4th Cir. 2015) (No. 14-4717). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?