US v. Manoj Jha
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to impose sanctions [999952594-2]; denying Motion to vacate [999914962-2] Originating case number: 1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [16-6856]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
MANOJ KUMAR JHA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
November 17, 2016
November 22, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Manoj Kumar Jha, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Manoj Kumar Jha appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion for a new trial and denying his motion for
reconsideration of the order granting the Government an extension
of time to file a response.
We have reviewed the record and find
no abuse of discretion by the district court and no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
United States v. Jha, No. 1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1 (D.
Md. June 13, 2016).
We deny Jha’s motion for sanctions and his
motion to vacate this court’s decision in United States v. Jha,
613 F. App’x 212 (4th Cir. 2015) (No. 14-4717).
We dispense with
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?