Raymond Griffin v. Donnie Harrison

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03276-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999949526]. Mailed to: Raymond Griffin. [16-6857]

Appeal: 16-6857

Doc: 14

Filed: 10/18/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6857

RAYMOND GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DONNIE HARRISON; OFFICER GILLIAM; OFFICER LAMAR; SERGEANT
BRIDGES;
OFFICER
BEY-ADAMS;
SERGEANT
SMITH;
OFFICER
HAMMONDS; JOHN AND JANE DOE,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CAPTAIN STEINBECK,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:15-ct-03276-D)

Submitted:

October 13, 2016

Decided:

October 18, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Griffin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6857

Doc: 14

Filed: 10/18/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Raymond Griffin seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing,
complaint.

in

part,

Griffin’s

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2012)

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292

(2012);

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).

The order Griffin seeks to appeal is neither a final

order

an

nor

appealable

interlocutory

or

collateral

order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2