US v. Jamell Mason

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case numbers: 3:09-cr-00087-JPB-JES-6, 3:16-cv-00044-JPB-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999952087]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-6866]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6866 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6866 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMELL MASON, a/k/a JAH, a/k/a Tremaine Mason, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (3:09-cr-00087-JPB-JES-6; 3:16-cv-00044-JPBRWT) Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 21, 2016 Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamell Mason, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Michael Adkins, Paul Thomas Camilletti, Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorneys, Anna Zartler Krasinski, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Jarod James Douglas, David J. Perri, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6866 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jamell Mason appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as successive and unauthorized. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mason, Nos. 3:09-cr-00087-JPB-JES-6; 3:16-cv-00044-JPB-RWT (N.D. W. Va. June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?