Keith Webb v. Steven Figiel
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:16-cv-00044-FPS-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999919879]. Mailed to: Keith Bryan Webb. [16-6883]
Appeal: 16-6883
Doc: 7
Filed: 08/30/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6883
KEITH BRYAN WEBB, a/k/a Keith Bryan Webb-El,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
STEVEN
FIGIEL,
COMMISSION,
Acting
Warden;
UNITED
STATES
PAROLE
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:16-cv-00044-FPS-RWT)
Submitted:
August 25, 2016
Decided:
August 30, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Bryan Webb, Appellant Pro Se.
Helen Campbell Altmeyer,
Erin Carter Tison, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling,
West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6883
Doc: 7
Filed: 08/30/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Keith Bryan Webb seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his expedited motion regarding the magistrate judge’s
paperless order denying Webb’s motion to strike.
This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2012),
and
certain
interlocutory
and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
seeks
to
appeal
is
neither
a
final
interlocutory or collateral order.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
order
nor
The order Webb
an
appealable
Accordingly, we dismiss the
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?