Keith Webb v. Steven Figiel

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:16-cv-00044-FPS-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999919879]. Mailed to: Keith Bryan Webb. [16-6883]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6883 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/30/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6883 KEITH BRYAN WEBB, a/k/a Keith Bryan Webb-El, Petitioner - Appellant, v. STEVEN FIGIEL, COMMISSION, Acting Warden; UNITED STATES PAROLE Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:16-cv-00044-FPS-RWT) Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 30, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Bryan Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin Carter Tison, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6883 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/30/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Keith Bryan Webb seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his expedited motion regarding the magistrate judge’s paperless order denying Webb’s motion to strike. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). seeks to appeal is neither a final interlocutory or collateral order. appeal for lack of jurisdiction. order nor The order Webb an appealable Accordingly, we dismiss the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?