Morris Speight-Bey v. Charles William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999903783-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999952123]. Mailed to: M Speight Bey. [16-6895]

Appeal: 16-6895

Doc: 8

Filed: 10/21/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6895

MORRIS SPEIGHT-BEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES WILLIAMS,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA)

Submitted:

October 18, 2016

Decided:

October 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Morris Speight-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6895

Doc: 8

Filed: 10/21/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Morris

Speight-Bey

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing his original 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and opening a
new case with his refiled § 2241 petition, which remains pending
below.
error.

We

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis,
court.

have

we

affirm

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

district

Speight-Bey v. Williams, No. 3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA (N.D.

W. Va. June 16, 2016).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2