US v. Luis Hernandez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cr-02062-JFA-4. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999975454]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-6899]
Appeal: 16-6899
Doc: 8
Filed: 11/28/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6899
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LUIS JOSE HERNANDEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (3:11-cr-02062-JFA-4)
Submitted:
November 22, 2016
Before DIAZ and
Circuit Judge.
THACKER,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
November 28, 2016
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luis Jose Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se.
Jane Barrett Taylor,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6899
Doc: 8
Filed: 11/28/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Luis
Jose
Hernandez
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying his motion to reconsider the district court’s denial of
his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.
court
lacked
jurisdiction
to
consider
Because the district
Hernandez’s
reconsideration, we affirm the denial of relief.
motion
for
See United
States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding
that
district
court
lacks
authority
to
grant
reconsider ruling on § 3582(c)(2) motion).
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
motion
to
We dispense with
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?