US v. Shaun Reed
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:05-cr-00003-GMG-JES-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999962591]. Mailed to: Shaun Reed. [16-6902]
Appeal: 16-6902
Doc: 5
Filed: 11/04/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6902
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SHAUN EUGENE REED,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:05-cr-00003-GMG-JES-1)
Submitted:
October 25, 2016
Decided:
November 4, 2016
Before KING, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shaun Eugene Reed, Appellant Pro Se.
Paul Thomas Camilletti,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6902
Doc: 5
Filed: 11/04/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Shaun
Eugene
Reed
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(d) motion to vacate judgment.
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
As the district court
correctly determined, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do
not provide a vehicle by which Reed may challenge his criminal
judgment.
See
United
States
v.
O’Keefe,
169
F.3d
281,
289
(5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Mosavi, 138 F.3d 1365, 1366
(11th
Cir.
satisfy
1998)
the
(per
“four
essential
coram nobis relief.
Additionally,
prerequisites”
Reed
needed
did
to
not
obtain
See Bereano v. United States, 706 F.3d 568,
576 (4th Cir. 2013).
order.
curiam).
We therefore affirm the district court’s
United States v. Reed, No. 3:05-cr-00003-GMG-JES-1 (N.D.
W. Va. June 28, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?