US v. Shaun Reed

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:05-cr-00003-GMG-JES-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999962591]. Mailed to: Shaun Reed. [16-6902]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6902 Doc: 5 Filed: 11/04/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6902 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SHAUN EUGENE REED, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cr-00003-GMG-JES-1) Submitted: October 25, 2016 Decided: November 4, 2016 Before KING, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shaun Eugene Reed, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6902 Doc: 5 Filed: 11/04/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Shaun Eugene Reed appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d) motion to vacate judgment. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed As the district court correctly determined, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide a vehicle by which Reed may challenge his criminal judgment. See United States v. O’Keefe, 169 F.3d 281, 289 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Mosavi, 138 F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir. satisfy 1998) the (per “four essential coram nobis relief. Additionally, prerequisites” Reed needed did to not obtain See Bereano v. United States, 706 F.3d 568, 576 (4th Cir. 2013). order. curiam). We therefore affirm the district court’s United States v. Reed, No. 3:05-cr-00003-GMG-JES-1 (N.D. W. Va. June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?