Vincent Taylor v. Harold Clarke
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motions to appoint/assign counsel [999903042-2], [999923321-2], [999971192-2]. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01188-JCC-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999989322]. Mailed to: Vincent Kyle Taylor. [16-6910]
Appeal: 16-6910
Doc: 27
Filed: 12/19/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6910
VINCENT KYLE TAYLOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections; MR.
WALKER, Warden; DR. NWAKUCHA, Medical Doctor; MR. HORN,
Sergeant; B. BOISE, Correctional Officer; MR. DIGGS, Warden;
MS. CLARKE, Medical Doctor; M. PRICE, Medical Administrator;
MR. HARDING, Sergeant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:15-cv-01188-JCC-TCB)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent Kyle Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6910
Doc: 27
Filed: 12/19/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Vincent
Kyle
Taylor
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing Taylor’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and he
has filed motions for appointment of counsel.
Taylor’s failure
to challenge on appeal the district court’s dispositive holdings
amounts to a waiver of appellate review of those holdings.
See
Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir.
2004).
Thus, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
Taylor
v. Clarke, No. 1:15-cv-01188-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. June 23, 2016).
We
deny
dispense
Taylor’s
with
contentions
are
motions
oral
for
argument
adequately
appointment
because
presented
in
the
the
of
counsel.
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?