Vincent Taylor v. Harold Clarke


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motions to appoint/assign counsel [999903042-2], [999923321-2], [999971192-2]. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01188-JCC-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999989322]. Mailed to: Vincent Kyle Taylor. [16-6910]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6910 Doc: 27 Filed: 12/19/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6910 VINCENT KYLE TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections; MR. WALKER, Warden; DR. NWAKUCHA, Medical Doctor; MR. HORN, Sergeant; B. BOISE, Correctional Officer; MR. DIGGS, Warden; MS. CLARKE, Medical Doctor; M. PRICE, Medical Administrator; MR. HARDING, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01188-JCC-TCB) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vincent Kyle Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6910 Doc: 27 Filed: 12/19/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Vincent Kyle Taylor appeals the district court’s order dismissing Taylor’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and he has filed motions for appointment of counsel. Taylor’s failure to challenge on appeal the district court’s dispositive holdings amounts to a waiver of appellate review of those holdings. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Thus, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Taylor v. Clarke, No. 1:15-cv-01188-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. June 23, 2016). We deny dispense Taylor’s with contentions are motions oral for argument adequately appointment because presented in the the of counsel. facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?